Hello again, today I will try to write something about the VW Lupo. I had the opportunity to possess a two-piece takowego model, one (blue) with the engine running with 1.0 and 1.4 16v engines. I made them a total of about 30tys km ... the first bit less, and why writes a little later.
Introduction
Lupo looks like everyone can see .... and probably always in the way I wrote about the appearance of each car, the beauty is a relative term, one will enjoy, others do not. I belong to that part which the car like it, and probably in large part because of a volkswagen, since so. If anyone is going to buy another, smaller car in a family it certainly can not ignore this suggestion.
measure
Probably no one who had the opportunity to Take the VW Lupo not say that these autko is small. On przciwnie, with the steering wheel would seem that it was some dostawczak - more than enough space. Even with 4 people it is possible to to travel as much as possible - only a small trunk that can be an obstacle. Visibility excellent, well-glazed, nicely illuminated in blue clocks. Equipment typically has some bonus in itself, and it is because there was never lupo sold in Poland - and therefore lack the national versions of scantily furnished.
Driving is not bad, wide tires 185/55 r14 with such weight and hardness of suspension just stick to the road, autko is lightweight and short wheelbase so I naturally can not be here to accomplish miracles in the field comfort at high speeds.
Engine 1.0
greatest mistake in this model .... katalogowo probably had about 50 horses, which does not change the fact that this was going to not - literally. Photo, said earlier colic 185/55 is too much for such an engine, driving very carefully, and so we will not fall below 7L/100km, so absolutely not recommend purchase of this already lupo engine .... unless we put there, lighter and narrower colic. Otherwise, while it is 75km from the version of 1.416v, autko is really nice its retraction in a full range of rotation. Riding him around the city, and squeeze between the other is a pleasure, especially when we feel perfectly its small dimensions, and we have this visibility. In the dynamic driving the head should not we burn a lot more than version 1.0 but from this result should be much lower. Petrol is still lupo 1.4 version 8 valve engine and 60 horsepower, such as for example in a polo 6n, where you also had a chance to do a few thousand kilometers. The mass of these vehicles are almost identical and I can also guarantee a very good performance and probably a bit smaller combustion engine that can collect a little better from the bottom and quite possible that there will be a little longer transmission. Unfortunately, I've never driven, nor met with version 1.4 FSI, which is a pity ... directory shows that he has great performance and burning funny, how this has to rzeczywstosci ... maybe one day I will check the data. Talking about lupo Also a version 3l - you have to remember that a vehicle is very different from others is not lupo 3l. It has a unique 1.2 TDI engine, tiptronic boxes, the program engine and gearbox written mostly in small combustion so there are no fireworks with the performance, but the fun of the symbolic demand for fuel - driving while quite comfortable, fully-fledged car. Do be afraid to buy this version? According to me, so ... As I said, Lupo was not sold in Poland, so the ASO is not trained to repair 1.2 TDI, and his complex tymbardziej gearbox, with the problems that are often (mostly by accident) and from what I am familiar, a few people can deal with this topic in our country. A good alternative is a version 1.7 SDI, the burning rates of 4-5 liters is not inferior performance characteristics, and the engine is as simple as kostrukcja cepa, because it's nothing but a slightly smaller 1.9 dz competence .... unfortunately never had occasion to ride anything which is 1.4 tdi so this question does not say.
PROS
- spacious interior
- excellent quality materials
- great visibility
- ease of driving around the city
- very snappy 1.416v engine, from combustion in the range of 6 liters
Cons - tiny trunk, virtually his lack of
- version 1.0 is not running, and burns no less than 1.4
- goals sheet on the door, I was angry ...
- plastic rear hatch love to speak - one he had driven 35 thousand, the second 90, in both the same.
- muĊowaty tachometer, you can fall asleep from looking at him ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment